Although it requires significantly more time, our methods include the math-intensive clarification and restoration process, versus the speculative enhancement only methods used by the competition. The George Zimmerman case was a great example of science-based clarification versus judgment-based enhancement.

In the images below, the enhanced version is open to speculation (Google), while our clarified evidence remains unchallenged to this day. This is just one example of why we are the world's most relied upon private lab, and our results are frequently praised by both plaintiff and defense.

We will improve your audio, video and image recordings using peer-reviewed industry best practices and software). We can provide detailed measurements and prove whether your discovery evidence tells the truth, or has been manipulated. To learn more, review our resources (focus, FAQ's), and CV.

Unlike the statistical nature of authentication testing, the enhancement process is akin to using a microscope, in that it exposes seemingly undetectable details but cannot be defined by a statistical error rate calculation. It is up to a qualified person to observe, hypothesize, predict, test, verify, and validate their opinions based upon numerical data, industry best practices and peer reviewed methodology. This understanding is at the core of the FP system, our never ending quest for excellence, and our peer-reviewed methods and software accepted within our industry.